
As the ban’s effective date approached, several hemp-product businesses filed a lawsuit challenging the executive order, including a manufacturer, distributor, and a retailer. They argued DeWine had overstepped his executive authority, that there was insufficient evidence showing the banned products presented an acute health threat, and that the order conflicted with established state law defining hemp under Ohio code.
On October 14, 2025, a Franklin County judge, Carl Aveni, granted a temporary restraining order that puts the ban on hold for 14 days while the legal challenge proceeds.
Key points from the court ruling and surrounding reporting:
For now, the ban is paused, and intoxicating hemp products remain legally sellable in Ohio, pending further court rulings.
The October 28 hearing will be pivotal. If the court declines to grant a longer injunction or eventually upholds the ban, enforcement could resume. Otherwise, the state may be forced to amend or drop the order.
Meanwhile, the hemp industry in Ohio retains the status quo for the moment, but it now operates under uncertainty until a court resolution or legislative policy emerges.
On October 8, 2025, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine issued an emergency executive order enacting a 120-day ban on the sale of intoxicating hemp products. The ban, set to take effect October 14, would pause sales of items like THC-infused gummies, vapes, drinks, tinctures, and other consumables with intoxicating hemp.
The administration justified the move by citing public health and safety concerns, especially around unregulated intoxicating hemp products that had proliferated in a regulatory gray zone. The order was intended as a temporary pause while state regulators and lawmakers worked to develop a clearer regulatory framework. In particular, legislative momentum existed around Senate Bill 86 (SB86) to govern hemp product sales, distribution, taxation, and safety requirements.
Under the governor’s plan:
The outcome of this legal challenge will play a major role in shaping the future of Ohio’s hemp industry. Governor DeWine’s attempted ban highlights growing concerns over unregulated intoxicating hemp products, while the court’s intervention underscores the importance of clear legislative action. As the case moves forward, businesses and consumers remain in limbo, awaiting a final decision. The coming weeks will determine whether Ohio enforces tighter restrictions or establishes a regulated framework for these products.